slopmeter · scanned 2026-09-10
ruvnet/ruflo scores grade D, 60 of 100.
Commit health is what costs the grade: p90 1103 lines, churn proxy 6%.
Against established software: 41% — above 11 of the 27 hand-written public projects in slopmeter's corpus, scanned 2026-09-10. A sample, not a census.
What was parsed
| language | lines | findings / kLOC | parser |
|---|---|---|---|
| ts | 416,899 | 1.5 | tree-sitter |
| js | 38,950 | 0.9 | tree-sitter |
| rust | 5,720 | 6.3 | tree-sitter |
Commits
354 first-parent commits on main in the window, lockfiles and build output excluded. Median 98 lines, p90 1103, 72 over 400 lines, p90 16 files per commit, churn proxy 6%.
How this was measured
Over-engineering is five patterns counted per thousand lines, parsed with go/types and tree-sitter rather than matched as text. Test coverage is logic files against whole-word mentions of their symbols in the test files beside them. Commit health reads git log --first-parent over the window, with lockfiles and build output excluded. The composite renormalises over whatever could be measured; anything that could not says so.
Run the same scan yourself — it clones into a temporary directory and removes it afterwards:
slopmeter github ruvnet/rufloThe file-level findings are not published here. slopmeter prints them for the people who can act on them; this page carries the aggregates they rest on.